Preparing for CAT 2026? View the Expected Slot 1 Paper & Analysis on Cetking →

CAT 2025 Slot 2 Question Paper with Solutions

  • 68 questions in CAT 2025 Slot 2
  • Sections: Quant 22 · Verbal 20 · DILR 26
  • 10 passage or sets, each on one page with all its questions
  • Difficulty: 20 Easy / 27 Medium / 16 Hard (63 rated)
  • Question and answer free · detailed solution after free login · updated 4 Nov 2026

The questions of this CAT slot, section by section. A reading passage or a data set always stays on one page with all its questions; questions that stand alone are five to a page.

Tap Show answer, or open the detailed solution (free login). Page 1 of 19.

CAT 2025 Slot 2 · QuantEasy
A certain amount of money was divided among Pinu, Meena, Rinu and Seema. Pinu received 20% of the total amount and Meena received 40% of the remaining amount. If Seema received 20% less than Pinu, the ratio of the amounts received by Pinu and Rinu is
  1. 5 : 8
  2. 2 : 1
  3. 1 : 2
  4. 8 : 5
Show answerHide answer

Answer: A. 5 : 8

CAT 2025 Slot 2 · QuantEasy
Let f(x) = x/(2x − 1) and g(x) = x/(x − 1). Then, the domain of the function
h(x) = f(g(x)) + g(f(x)) is all real numbers except
  1. −1, 1, and 1/2
  2. −1/2, 1/2, and 1
  3. 1/2 and 1
  4. 1/2, 1, and 3/2
Show answerHide answer

Answer: A. −1, 1, and 1/2

CAT 2025 Slot 2 · QuantMedium
The ratio of expenditures of Lakshmi and Meenakshi is 2 : 3, and the ratio of income of Lakshmi to expenditure of Meenakshi is 6 : 7. If excess of income over expenditure is saved by Lakshmi and Meenakshi, and the ratio of their savings is 4 : 9, then the ratio of their incomes is
  1. 3 : 5
  2. 5 : 6
  3. 7 : 8
  4. 2 : 1
Show answerHide answer

Answer: A. 3 : 5

CAT 2025 Slot 2 · QuantEasy
An item with a cost price of Rs. 1650 is sold at a certain discount on a fixed marked price to earn a profit of 20% on the cost price. If the discount was doubled, the profit would have been Rs. 110. The rate of discount, as a percentage, at which the profit percentage would be equal to the rate of discount, is nearest to
  1. 12
  2. 18
  3. 16
  4. 14
Show answerHide answer

Answer: D. 14

CAT 2025 Slot 2 · QuantMedium
A loan of Rs 1000 is fully repaid by two instalments of Rs 530 and Rs 594, paid at the end of first and second year, respectively. If the interest is compounded annually, then the rate of interest, in percentage, is _____
  1. 10
  2. 9
  3. 8
  4. 11
Show answerHide answer

Answer: C. 8

Frequently asked questions

How many questions are there in CAT 2025 Slot 2?

68 questions: Quant 22, Verbal 20, DILR 26.

Which sections does CAT 2025 Slot 2 have?

Open a section: Quant, Verbal, DILR. Long sets stay together on one page.

How difficult is CAT 2025 Slot 2?

Of the 63 questions that carry a difficulty rating, 20 are Easy, 27 Medium and 16 Hard; the other 5 are not rated yet.

Are the solutions free?

The question and its answer are free for everyone. The detailed Cetking solution opens after a free login with your mobile number (OTP).

Where can I find the other papers?

Question Paper, Answer key and Detailed Solutions

CAT 2025 Slot 2 – Score vs Attempts

The following table will be updated once student feedback from Slot 2 is analysed:

PercentileVARC ScoreDILR ScoreQA ScoreOverall Score
99.952.5042.0045.00116.00
99.544.0034.0037.0097.50
9938.0027.3331.3384.33
9732.5623.0025.6771.11
9528.6719.0022.0063.33
9023.5014.5016.0050.50
8016.6711.3312.3337.00
7012.0010.009.0027.00
609.008.007.0025.00

CAT 2025 Slot 2 – Percentile vs Attempts

The following table will be updated once student feedback from Slot 2 is analysed:

%ileVerbal AttemptsDILR AttemptsQuant AttemptsOverall Attempts
5034210
6045313
7066515
8099622
851010725
901211929
9515131135
9818151343
9920161548
10020+18+17+70+

CAT 2025 Slot 2 – Actual Paper, Question Pattern & Complete Analysis

The second slot of CAT 2025 will be conducted on [30 Nov 2025] from [12.30 and 2:30 pm]. With Slot 1 already completed earlier in the day, early feedback from test-takers has indicated potential shifts in pattern, sectional weightage, and difficulty levels. This page will be updated in real-time once Slot 2 concludes. Go through the full CAT 2025 Slot 2 analysis to understand the paper pattern, difficulty level, expected cutoffs, and section-wise breakdown.

CAT 2025 Slot 2 – Overall Exam Structure

Early reports indicate [mention expected change – e.g., MCQ/TITA distribution, VA type changes, DILR set pattern]. The table below shows the expected section structure (to be updated after the exam):

SectionDurationMCQsTITATotal
VARC40 min22224
DILR40 min14822
QA40 min14822
Total120 min481868

Marking scheme: +3 for correct, −1 for incorrect (MCQ only), and no negative marking for TITA.

CAT 2025 Slot 2 – Verbal Ability & Reading Comprehension (VARC)

As per early inputs, CAT 2025 Slot 2 VARC featured [16 (4x4)] RC questions and [8] VA questions. There were 2 each on Summary, Para Jumbles, Para Completion, Summary and Odd One Out. RC difficulty was [2 Easy to mod, 2 Moderate to high]. CAT 2025 Verbal presented predictable RCs with moderate reasoning and fewer vocabulary traps. VA focused on Summary, Paragraph Completion, and Odd Sentence questions, maintaining logical coherence as the core skill. Accuracy dominated over attempts, and careful reading of nuanced RC paragraphs separated 95+ percentile performers from the rest.

Area / Question TypeNo. of QsLOD
Reading Comprehension16Medium to High
Passage 1: AI (For and Against)4Easy to Medium
Passage 2: Science & Culture4Medium to High
Passage 3: TetraFish evolution4Easy to Medium
Passage 4: Literature & Roles4Medium to High
Verbal Ability8Medium to High
Summary2Medium to High
Paragraph Completion2Easy to Medium
Odd Sentence2Easy to Medium
Para Jumbles2Medium to High

The passage below is accompanied by four questions. Based on the passage, choose the best answer for each question.

In [my book “Searches”], I chronicle how big technology companies have exploited human language for their gain. We let this happen, I argue, because we also benefit somewhat from using the products. It’s a dynamic that makes us complicit in big tech’s accumulation of wealth and power: we’re both victims and beneficiaries. I describe this complicity, but I also enact it, through my own internet archives: my Google searches, my Amazon product reviews and, yes, my ChatGPT dialogues. . . .

People often describe chatbots’ textual output as “bland” or “generic” – the linguistic equivalent of a beige office building. OpenAI’s products are built to “sound like a colleague”, as OpenAI puts it, using language that, coming from a person, would sound “polite”, “empathetic”, “kind”, “rationally optimistic” and “engaging”, among other qualities. OpenAI describes these strategies as helping its products seem “professional” and “approachable”. This appears to be bound up with making us feel safe . . .

Trust is a challenge for artificial intelligence (AI) companies, partly because their products regularly produce falsehoods and reify sexist, racist, US-centric cultural norms. While the companies are working on these problems, they persist: OpenAI found that its latest systems generate errors at a higher rate than its previous system. In the book, I wrote about the inaccuracies and biases and also demonstrated them with the products. When I prompted Microsoft’s Bing Image Creator to produce a picture of engineers and space explorers, it gave me an entirely male cast of characters; when my father asked ChatGPT to edit his writing, it transmuted his perfectly correct Indian English into American English. Those weren’t flukes. Research suggests that both tendencies are widespread.

In my own ChatGPT dialogues, I wanted to enact how the product’s veneer of collegial neutrality could lull us into absorbing false or biased responses without much critical engagement. Over time, ChatGPT seemed to be guiding me to write a more positive book about big tech – including editing my description of OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, to call him “a visionary and a pragmatist”. I’m not aware of research on whether ChatGPT tends to favor big tech, OpenAI or Altman, and I can only guess why it seemed that way in our conversation. OpenAI explicitly states that its products shouldn’t attempt to influence users’ thinking. When I asked ChatGPT about some of the issues, it blamed biases in its training data – though I suspect my arguably leading questions played a role too. When I queried ChatGPT about its rhetoric, it responded: “The way I communicate is designed to foster trust and confidence in my responses, which can be both helpful and potentially misleading.”. . .

OpenAI has its own goals, of course. Among them, it emphasizes wanting to build AI that “benefits all of humanity”. But while the company is controlled by a non-profit with that mission, its funders still seek a return on their investment. That will presumably require getting people using products such as ChatGPT even more than they already are – a goal that is easier to accomplish if people see those products as trustworthy collaborators.

Question 1 of 66

Q1CAT 2025 · Slot 2 · CAT Medium✓ Answer verified

Passage 1: AI (For and Against)

In [my book “Searches”], I chronicle how big technology companies have exploited human language for their gain. We let this happen, I argue, because we also benefit somewhat from using the products. It’s a dynamic that makes us complicit in big tech’s accumulation of wealth and power: we’re both victims and beneficiaries. I describe this complicity, but I also enact it, through my own internet archives: my Google searches, my Amazon product reviews and, yes, my ChatGPT dialogues. . . . People often describe chatbots’ textual output as “bland” or “generic” – the linguistic equivalent of a beige office building. OpenAI’s products are built to “sound like a colleague”, as OpenAI puts it, using language that, coming from a person, would sound “polite”, “empathetic”, “kind”, “rationally optimistic” and “engaging”, among other qualities. OpenAI describes these strategies as helping its products seem “professional” and “approachable”. This appears to be bound up with making us feel safe . . . Trust is a challenge for artificial intelligence (AI) companies, partly because their products regularly produce falsehoods and reify sexist, racist, US-centric cultural norms. While the companies are working on these problems, they persist: OpenAI found that its latest systems generate errors at a higher rate than its previous system. In the book, I wrote about the inaccuracies and biases and also demonstrated them with the products. When I prompted Microsoft’s Bing Image Creator to produce a picture of engineers and space explorers, it gave me an entirely male cast of characters; when my father asked ChatGPT to edit his writing, it transmuted his perfectly correct Indian English into American English. Those weren’t flukes. Research suggests that both tendencies are widespread. In my own ChatGPT dialogues, I wanted to enact how the product’s veneer of collegial neutrality could lull us into absorbing false or biased responses without much critical engagement. Over time, ChatGPT seemed to be guiding me to write a more positive book about big tech – including editing my description of OpenAI’s CEO, Sam Altman, to call him “a visionary and a pragmatist”. I’m not aware of research on whether ChatGPT tends to favor big tech, OpenAI or Altman, and I can only guess why it seemed that way in our conversation. OpenAI explicitly states that its products shouldn’t attempt to influence users’ thinking. When I asked ChatGPT about some of the issues, it blamed biases in its training data – though I suspect my arguably leading questions played a role too. When I queried ChatGPT about its rhetoric, it responded: “The way I communicate is designed to foster trust and confidence in my responses, which can be both helpful and potentially misleading.”. . . OpenAI has its own goals, of course. Among them, it emphasizes wanting to build AI that “benefits all of humanity”. But while the company is controlled by a non-profit with that mission, its funders still seek a return on their investment. That will presumably require getting people using products such as ChatGPT even more than they already are – a goal that is easier to accomplish if people see those products as trustworthy collaborators.

The author compares AI-generated texts with “a beige office building” for all of the following reasons EXCEPT:

0/66 tried · 0 right

Frequently asked questions

Where can I get the CAT 2025 Slot 2 question paper PDF?

This page links the complete Slot 2 question paper PDF with detailed solutions, plus separate Verbal, DILR and Quant PDFs with solutions in their own sections.

Where is the CAT 2025 Slot 2 answer key?

Each actual question on this page is followed by its answer and explanation, and the downloadable PDFs include detailed solutions. See the VARC, DILR and Quant sections below.

Which RC passages came in CAT 2025 Slot 2?

The four RC passages were on AI (for and against), Science and Culture, Tetra fish evolution, and Literature and Roles. VA had 2 questions each of Summary, Paragraph Completion, Odd Sentence and Para Jumbles. See the VARC section below.

Which DILR sets came in CAT 2025 Slot 2?

The 5 sets were Authors and Books (two bar graphs), Pollution Index, a Scatter Plot graph, Ranking of 6 balls and 4 holes, and a Musicians Venn diagram set. See the DILR table and solved sets below.

What score was needed for 99 percentile in CAT 2025 Slot 2?

The page's provisional score vs percentile table puts 99 percentile at an overall score of about 84.33 (VARC 38, DILR 27.33, QA 31.33). See the Score vs Attempts table.

Which topics came in CAT 2025 Slot 2 Quant?

Of the 22 Quant questions, Algebra had 4, and Percentages/Interest, Ratios/Mixtures, Geometry, Modern Maths and Numbers had 3 each, with 2 from Time, Distance and Work. See the Quant section below.

What next

Admit cards · CAT admit card · © Cetking Universe · Terms & Privacy · By using this site, you agree to Cetking's Terms.